Impact of Cathode Variations on the Mechanical Properties of Hard Anodizing in Sulfuric Acid 15% and Phosphoric Acid 1%

Main Article Content

Rony Pasonang Sihombing

Keywords

Aluminum 1100 Alloy Hard Anodizing Aluminum Cathode Lead Cathode Mechanical Properties

Abstract

Aluminum 1100 could be used as domestic appliances material, especially on kitchen equipment. The purpose of this research was to improve the properties of aluminum 1100. In order to improve the physical and mechanical properties, a hard anodizing process was conducted. In the hard anodizing process, 1100 aluminum workpieces are sanded, decreased in alkaline solution and neutralized in acidic solution. The hard anodizing process is carried out by placing the workpiece on the positive pole and the electrode on the negative pole (cathode) of the direct current source. The hard anodizing process of 1100 aluminum alloy was carried out in a mixture of 15% sulfuric acid and 1% phosphoric acid solution, current density of 3A/dm2, anodizing time of 30 minutes, temperature of 5 °C, and cathode variation (Al and Pb). The results showed the formation of an oxide layer on the metal surface consisting of two types of layers, called the barrier layer and the porous layer. The barrier layer has no pores because it has conductive microstructure properties and reaches the maximum thickness. The porous layer formed can increase the overall thickness of the oxide layer, while the barrier layer remains a constant thickness and increases the hardness level of the aluminum. This study resulted in a process efficiency of 83.04% with the best oxide layer thickness of 11.43 μm and the highest hardness of 144.25 HVNoxide layer thickness of 11.43 μm and the highest hardness of 144.25 HVN.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 77 | PDF Downloads 30

References

[1] G. Scampone, A. Russo, A. Carminati, and G. Timelli, “The influence of the electrolytic bath on the hard anodizing of diecast Al–Si–Cu alloys,” Results in Surfaces and Interfaces, vol. 9, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rsurfi.2022.100089.
[2] A. Wisnujati, H. Wijayanto, A. M. Widodo, Mudjijana, and M. Rahaman, “Characterization of Anodizing Process on Aluminum Series 6 with Variable Voltage,” in Proceedings of the First Mandalika International Multi-Conference on Science and Engineering 2022, MIMSE 2022 (Mechanical and Electrical), Atlantis Press International BV, 2023, pp. 46–56. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-078-7_7.
[3] Y. M. Zulaida, A. H. Ramadhanisa, and T. Partuti, “The effect of electrolyte concentration and electric current on the quality of surface colouring on anodized aluminium,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing Ltd, Dec. 2019. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/673/1/012138.
[4] AircraftMaterialsUK.com Ltd, “AirCraft Material,” 2019.
[5] ASTM International, “ASTM-B-209-96,” in Standard Specification for Aluminium Alloy Sheet Aluminium Plate, United States, 2022, p. 298.
[6] C. Soffritti, A. Fortini, A. Nastruzzi, R. Sola, M. Merlin, and G. L. Garagnani, “Dry sliding behavior of an aluminum alloy after innovative hard anodizing treatments,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 12, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ma14123281.
[7] A. Bozza, R. Giovanardi, T. Manfredini, and P. Mattioli, “Pulsed current effect on hard anodizing process of 7075-T6 aluminium alloy,” Surf Coat Technol, vol. 270, pp. 139–144, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.03.010.
[8] R. M. Miranda, T. G. Santos, J. Gandra, N. Lopes, and R. J. C. Silva, “Reinforcement strategies for producing functionally graded materials by friction stir processing in aluminium alloys,” J Mater Process Technol, vol. 213, no. 9, pp. 1609–1615, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.022.
[9] H. Çalişkan, C. Kurbanoǧlu, P. Panjan, M. Čekada, and D. Kramar, “Wear behavior and cutting performance of nanostructured hard coatings on cemented carbide cutting tools in hard milling,” Tribol Int, vol. 62, pp. 215–222, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2013.02.035.
[10] “Investigation of Mechanical and Metallurgical Properties of Friction Stir Corner Welded Dissimilar Thickness AA5086-AA6061 Aluminium Alloys.” [Online]. Available: https://www.scielo.br/j/mr/a/6KyGYvBXWVB33VTTp9HRhCh/?lang=en
[11] A. S. Darmawan, T. W. B. Riyadi, A. Hamid, B. W. Febriantoko, and B. S. Putra, “Corrosion resistance improvement of aluminum under anodizing process,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics Inc., Jun. 2018. doi: 10.1063/1.5042862.
[12] H. Asoh and T. Sano, “Forming Hard Anodic Films on Aluminum by Anodization in Oxalic Acid and Alcohol,” J Electrochem Soc, vol. 168, no. 10, p. 103506, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac2ec1.
[13] M. Ardelean, S. Lascǎu, E. Ardelean, and A. Josan, “Surface treatments for aluminium alloys,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Physics Publishing, Jan. 2018. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/294/1/012042.
[14] ASTM International, “ASTM E 384,” in Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials, United States, 2019, pp. 1–15.
[15] Gawad, “Characterization and corrosion behavior of anodized Aluminum alloys for military industries applications in artificial seawater,” Surfaces and Interfaces, pp. 314–323, 2019.
[16] “Testing Machines and Testing Systems for Metals.” [Online]. Available: www.zwickroell.com/en/applications/metals/standards
[17] A. Rattanasatitkul, S. Prombanpong, and P. Tuengsook, “An effect of process parameters to anodic thickness in hard anodizing process,” in Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2016, pp. 168–172. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.872.168.
[18] R. Gruber et al., “Investigation of Oxide Thickness on Technical Aluminium Alloys—A Comparison of Characterization Methods,” Metals (Basel), vol. 13, no. 7, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/met13071322.
[19] A. Rattanasatitkul, S. Prombanpong, and P. Tuengsook, “An effect of process parameters to anodic thickness in hard anodizing process,” in Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2016, pp. 168–172. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.872.168.
[20] Wijayanti, “Repository Poltekkes Denpasar.” Accessed: May 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://repository.poltekkesdenpasar.ac.id/6223/2/BAB II.pdf
[21] A. Rattanasatitkul, S. Prombanpong, and P. Tuengsook, “An effect of process parameters to anodic thickness in hard anodizing process,” in Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2016, pp. 168–172. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.872.168.
[22] A. Rattanasatitkul, S. Prombanpong, and P. Tuengsook, “An effect of process parameters to anodic thickness in hard anodizing process,” in Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2016, pp. 168–172. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.872.168.
[23] M. S. Ilango, A. Mutalikdesai, and S. K. Ramasesha, “Anodization of Aluminium using a fast two-step process,” Journal of Chemical Sciences, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 153–158, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s12039-015-1006-8.
[24] L. Zaraska, E. Kurowska, G. D. Sulka, I. Senyk, and M. Jaskula, “The effect of anode surface area on nanoporous oxide formation during anodizing of low purity aluminum (AA1050 alloy),” Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 361–368, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10008-013-2215-z.
[25] C. J. Donahue and J. A. Exline, “Anodizing and coloring aluminum alloys,” J Chem Educ, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 711–715, May 2014, doi: 10.1021/ed3005598.